|
| |
2006 MO-16 Soils Newsletter - 2006
Message From The MO Leader’s Desk
By Luis Hernandez
MO-16 Team Leader
Greetings!
In this edition of MO-16 Newsletter I’m going to focus on
two items:
MLRA Implementation Update
Last summer MO-16 State Soil Scientists (SSS’s) and Soil
Data Quality Specialists (SDQS’s) met in Little Rock with the objective of
developing a proposal to implement Major Land Resources Areas (MLRA) soil survey
office structure in the region. The first step of the proposal development was
an evaluation of the distribution of MLRA management areas and Soil Survey
Project Offices. The process was completed utilizing “guiding principles”
provided by the Soil Survey Division. Thanks to MO-16 State Soil Scientists and
Soil Data Quality Specialists expertise the group was able to develop a strong
science based proposal.
A joint meeting of MO-9 and MO-16 Board of Directors (BOD’s)
was held early this fiscal year. The meeting objectives were to present and
discuss proposed MLRA management areas and Soil Survey Project Offices. The
BOD’s approved proposed MLRA management areas and Soil Survey Project Offices.
The 14 MLRA’s in Soil Survey Region 16 were reduced to nine management areas.
The proposal was submitted to the Soil Survey Division,
early this calendar year, for consideration and to be included as part of the
national implementation plan. The timeline established by the Soil Survey
Division for MLRA implementation is as follows:
-
Second round Soil Survey Areas review/edit - September
23, 2005
-
Second draft National Map - October 21, 2005
-
Distribute Draft Plan and Maps to NLT - November 20,
2005
-
STC and Cooperators review and revise plan and office
locations - January 1, 2006
-
Complete National Implementation Plan - April 30, 2006
-
STC/MO offices submit a 3 to 5year migration plan -
July 30, 2006
-
Begin National Implementation - October 1, 2006
Southern Cooperative Soil Survey Conference
The Southern Cooperative Soil Survey Conference is
scheduled for the week of June 12-15, 2006 in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. An
article with additional information is included in this edition of MO-16
Newsletter. The registration deadline is May 19, 2006. Please contact Jimmy
Ford, Oklahoma State Soil Scientist, for additional information or questions.
His email is Jimmy.Ford@ok.usda.gov
and telephone 405-742-1247.
NRCS Establishes MLRA Soil Survey Office at UAPB
By Leslie Glover
Soil Data Quality Specialist, MO-16
A new cooperative effort between NRCS and the University of
Arkansas at Pine Bluff (UAPB) to establish a Major Land Resource Area soil
survey project office on the campus resulted in a Memorandum of Understanding
being signed during a ceremony December 16, 2005 at the school.
UAPB is providing, at no costs to NRCS, office space,
storage space for soil survey equipment, access to a GIS laboratory with more
than 20 high-end GIS computers, printer, plotter, access to a soils laboratory
with the latest technology for soil testing and analysis, and access to
university telecommunications facilities to receive and transmit meetings to and
from any part of the world using satellite technology.
NRCS presence on the UAPB campus will facilitate student
and faculty exposure to NRCS and soil survey programs and activities, NRCS
career opportunities, and technical assistance in curriculum development.
“UAPB students and faculty are already engaged in a
statewide soil survey project on the evaluation of soils data for various Major
Land Resource Areas in Arkansas” said Luis Hernandez, MLRA Leader and State Soil
Scientist.
“This collaboration enables Arkansas NRCS to modernize
existing digital soil data, to improve information contained in various soils
databases, and to familiarize potential employees with technologies used in
editing and digitizing soils data,” he said.
The signing event was part of a conservation tour,
sponsored by the National Organization of Professional Black NRCS Employees, to
allow NRCS employees from all over the country to observe successful
conservation projects around Arkansas.
“This new collaboration with UAPB is a good example of how
we can engage new cooperators in a creative way that will fulfill the NRCS
mission,” Hernandez said.
The Maine Experience
By Marie Ross
Soil Scientist
Glenwood, AR, MLRA Soil Survey Project Office
During the spring and summer of 2005 I was given the
opportunity to participate in a soil survey detail in Hancock County, Maine. The
detail lasted from June 6 to September 8. I worked out of the Bangor Field
Office along with another soil scientist, Alan Peer, from Carthage, Missouri.
The area that I surveyed was west of Nicatous Lake in a
remote section of Hancock County. I mapped over 27,000 acres at a scale of
1:40,000, which was at the order 3 level. Most of the soils were spodosols in an
area dominated by glacial till. I had to get accustomed to things not normally
encountered when working in Arkansas, such as black flies, bogs, and moose.
I enjoyed the bogs and seeing moose; the black flies I
could live without. I would recommend detail work for anyone who has the
opportunity.
Working in a different state will expose you to new
concepts and will show not only how different we are across soil survey regions,
but also how we are the same. The experience was extremely rewarding.
I would also like to note that I had great support from my
soils staff both at home in Arkansas and in Maine.
Welcome Aboard Richard!
By Jeff Olson
Soil Survey Project Leader
Glenwood, AR
We want to extend a hearty welcome to our newest member of
the NRCS and soil survey family here in Arkansas and in MO-16, Richard Vaught.
Richard came on board with the agency on October 3, 2005, at the MLRA Soil
Survey Project Office in Glenwood.
He is a native of Grove, Oklahoma, and holds both a
Bachelor’s Degree and a Master’s Degree in Agriculture from the University of
Arkansas at Fayetteville. His interest in soil science was sparked by childhood
visits to his grandfather’s farm.
Richard enjoys a variety of outdoors activities, and has
been spending much of his spare time enjoying the Ouachita National Forest.
Richard joins Jeff Olson and Marie Ross at the Glenwood
office as they undertake soil mapping work on the Ouachita National Forest and
soil survey evaluation and maintenance work on high priority areas of western
Arkansas.
Arkansas County Soil Survey Public Meeting and Web Soil Survey Release
By Leslie Glover
Soil Data Quality Specialist, MO-16
Soil Survey has been and continues to be the foundation for
natural resource and conservation planning since the “Great Depression” and
“Dust Bowl” era. Due to the tremendous loss of topsoil during that period, the
United States Congress created the National Soil Survey Program to inventory the
nation’s soil resources and to develop ways to reduce soil erosion.
The first soil survey work in Arkansas County was completed
for the area of Stuttgart in 1902. The soil map consisted of three soils: Miami
clay loam, Almyra silt loam, and Guthrie clay. Since then soils information for
Arkansas County has been improved three times, and includes a wide array of
information from soil classifications to interpretations for wildlife, septic
systems, recreation, forestry, and crop production. The latest remapping of
Arkansas County was completed in 1995.
Because of the rapid change in technology, the NRCS has
taken the opportunity to improve the way it delivers soil surveys; as well as,
to increase the speed which soil surveys are updated.
The NRCS currently provides several different alternatives
for customers to gather soils information including: compact discs, the national
Soils Data Mart, and via the World Wide Web. The most current soils information
is posted to the Web Soil Survey (http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/),
which provides secure public access to the national soils information system.
This website is a simple yet powerful way to access and analyze soils data that
contributes to every aspect of public and private land use and development.
Arkansas NRCS celebrated the release of the most current
soils information for Arkansas County on March 1, 2006, at the Phillips
Community College in DeWitt, Arkansas; the public was encouraged to attend.
Several topics were discussed including how soil surveys are used in estimating
taxes and how soil surveys are used to develop conservation plans.
Additional soil surveys can be requested from the local
NRCS District Conservationist,
Marshall Handcock, in DeWitt, Arkansas.
On the Road with NASIS
By Larry Kichler
Soil Data Quality Specialist, MO-16
Citrix, a web based access to the National Soil Information
System, NASIS, is taking training to the field.
In MO-16, laptops reserved for training have been made
available to use in local field offices for small group training sessions.
The Carencro, Louisiana, Soil Survey Project office was the
site for a NASIS Data Base Management training. We were able to bring in the
Soil Survey team from Denham Springs- Burnell Muse, Project Leader, and Lyfon
Morris and Darren Boudreaux, Soil Scientists, to join the Carencro Soil Survey
Project office team of Gerald Trahan, Project Leader, and Michael Lindsey and
Curt Riche, both Soil Scientists. Also joining was Charles Guillory, Assistant
State Soil Scientist from Alexandria.
This central location was chosen because it allowed travel
without using per diem.
Arkansas Soil Characterization Database Project
By Edgar Mersiovsky
Assistant State Soil Scientist, AR
The NRCS and the University of Arkansas have been long-term
partners in the National Cooperative Soil Survey Program in Arkansas.
Since 1956 this partnership has resulted in the sampling
and characterization of more than 1,250 soil pedons and 10,500 soil horizons.
This database contains data for all but two counties in the state.
The Arkansas Soil Characterization Database Project is a
cooperative effort between the NRCS and University of Arkansas to bring this
important database up to current database standards. A final product from this
project will be data and pedon descriptions for more that 1250 soil pedons and
10,500 soil horizons that will be stored in a database on CD-ROM.
The Arkansas Soil Characterization Database is the
foundation database for the classification and interpretation of the soils in
Arkansas. In the future this database will be used in the maintenance and
updating of all the county soil surveys in the state. Considerable work is being
done on the database to bring it up to current soil database standards to enable
more effective presentation and use of the data.
Booneville Field Day
By Edgar Mersiovsky
Assistant State Soil Scientist, AR
Late winter marks the time when across the country FFA Land
Judging practice contests begin. In Arkansas, the Resource Soil Scientists have
a key role in the education of local high school students in the area of soils
and land use.
The Booneville Field Day is one of the first contests of
the year in Arkansas. This contest began 15 years ago out of necessity for
retired Resource Soil Scientist Bill Garner.
For much of the late winter and early spring, Bill would go
to many high schools in the Arkansas River Valley. One of the local Agriculture
Teachers suggested that instead of Bill putting so many miles on the road that
the schools come to him.
The Booneville Field Day has grown to over 50 schools
represented in the Land Contest alone. Add several other contests and the
attendance is over 1,100 students.
Glen Laurent, Resource Soil Scientist in the Northwest Area
of Arkansas, has taken the reigns of the contest for the past 12 years. Along
with the contest, the field day is a time to teach students and agriculture
teachers. Many of the agriculture teachers like to come to this contest since
Glen is the lead for the state contest.
Just as it is in other states, these types of activities
are some of the most enjoyable that a Soil Scientist can take part in because we
get to share our knowledge with the youth of today.
Transitioning to the Electronic Soil Survey
By Daniel Johnson
Soil Survey Project Leader
USDA-NRCS, Monroe, Louisiana
A wide variety of exciting new technology has become
available to Soil Scientists in certain parts of the country during the last
couple of years, especially in the realm of spatial data.
The availability of powerful and versatile GIS software,
digital surveys and an assortment of other web-based spatial data, has opened up
the opportunity for on-screen map development and editing utilizing tremendous
amount of supporting documentation.
One of the more exciting products for Soil Survey is LIDAR.
LIDAR stands for Light Detection and Ranging. It applies the same principle as
radar except laser is used instead of radio wave. Its principle use in Soil
Survey is for the measurement of elevation. Elevation data can be represented in
different ways. In its raw form it is a series of points stored as x,y,z
coordinates, where x and y represent latitude and longitude, and z is the
elevation.
Another representation of elevation data is as contour
lines. In Louisiana, the contour data derived from LIDAR is in a shapefile
format.
A third representation of elevation data is as a DEM
(Digital Elevation Model). The DEM is a raster, or grid format. Each cell of the
grid holds the average elevation of that area (5 meter grid). ArcMap uses a 3D
Analyst extension to read DEMs. The USGS DEM file format is derived from
1:24,000 7.5 minute topographic quadrangle maps. USGS DEMs are readily available
but are not as high resolution, and so not as great a value in soil map unit
delineation, as DEMs generated from LIDAR.
The DEMs are readily converted to 3-dimensional hillshade
layers using 3D Analyst. Slope-group layers can also be developed with the same
technique. Of course, these kinds of tools will prove their greatest utility in
areas of greatest relief.
This survey was produced during a time in the NCSS’s
history when association map units were encouraged for hilly terrain. Therefore,
the only lines that consistently attempt to follow the landform are those
delineating alluvial flood plains. The original lines were likely drawn using
stereo paired imagery and following the hardwood signature of the photo. When
the soil lines are placed over the 7.5 minute quadrangle and the FEMA flood map,
it becomes apparent that some misplacement of the floodplain boundaries has
occurred.
The quality of this particular soils map could be
dramatically improved by editing based on the data provided by overlaying the
topo quad and the FEMA map. Viewing the same area with the FEMA map overlaying a
LIDAR generated 3D hillshade (Figure 3), brings into sharper contrast those
places where the FEMA map is in error (the flood zone fails to capture the
active channel of the stream in some instances). The LIDAR penetrates the
vegetative canopy, producing an image of ‘bare-ground’ conditions.
The changes in landform across the map are, therefore, much
more pronounced than that depicted by the topo quad contour lines, or by aerial
photography. Adding a colorized slope layer generated from the LIDAR data
(Figure 4) makes even the natural levee along the stream channel stand out from
the slack-water areas, and can aid in establishing component percentages for the
floodplain association. Of course, this layer will also aid in setting up slope
phases for the upland map units.
The LIDAR coverage in Louisiana is not a mosaic, so it must
be downloaded one quarter quad at a time. The Louisiana Geographical Information
Working Group has plans to develop mosaics of the LIDAR data, but this effort
will be dependent on the availability of adequate funds.
Landforms, Surfaces, and Parent Materials of Southwest Missouri (MLRA 116) A
Proposed Project for Fiscal Year 2006
John D. Preston, MLRA Team Leader
Richard L. Tummons, Soil Data Quality Specialist
This project was submitted to, and has been tentatively
accepted by the National Soil Survey Center Investigations Staff. Initial
contacts have been made by Doug Wysocki, Research Soil Scientist, NSSC. Project
dates in August have been discussed. A summary of the proposed project follows.
Following the completion of the “Once over” Soil Survey of
the state of Missouri and the establishment of MLRA Project Offices throughout
the state, it has become evident that there is a need for guidelines to develop
consistency in soil terminology for landforms and parent materials, both within
the state of Missouri and with adjoining states. Many series and/or map units
have been mapped on multiple landforms, while other series have been split out
based mostly on a landform. Benchmark soils affected would include, but not be
limited to: Clarksville, Creldon, Gasconade, Gatewood, Goss, Hoberg, Ocie, Pomme,
Poynor, Scholten, Tonti, and Viraton series.
The Project will consist of a field trip throughout
southwest Missouri and northwest Arkansas to observe landscapes, landforms and
representative soils throughout the MLRA. Discussion will define names for
landforms, surfaces, and parent materials. Questions for discussion at the field
assist will include, but not be limited to: Landscapes and landforms:
Recommended and consistent use of terms such as plateau,
hills, hill slope, upland, sideslope, backslope, ridge, interfluve, knobs,
strath terrace, foot slope, toe slope, and structural bench. Parent Materials:
Occurrence or absence of loess in MLRA 116; recommended use of the terms
“reworked” loess, silty sediments, colluvium, pedisediment, slope wash, and
slope alluvium; recommended use of the term residuum versus clayey sediments;
recommended parent materials for soils with fragipans and/or fragic properties.
Geomorphic Surfaces: Relevance to landscapes; relevance to parent materials;
relevance to mapping in Southwest Missouri (MLRA 116); relevance in areas of
“deep residuum”.
This information is needed for the consistent population of
NASIS data map units and for the revision of Official Series descriptions.
Information of this nature is also critical as work begins in creating a
“perfect join” between states. Information would also be vital to the exact
exchange of data and concepts when working on future MLRA wide projects
involving multiple states.
Ideally, participants would represent the NSSC, the
Springfield MLRA Project Office, the Missouri Department of Natural Resources,
MO-16 Soil Data Quality Specialist, representatives from the Missouri and
Arkansas state soils staffs, and universities with interests in MLRA 116. The
final products will include:
1) A “Glossary of Acceptable Landforms and Parent Materials
for MLRA 116”. The NSSC should author this document for use as a guide to the
consistent development of NASIS data map units and revision of Official Series
Descriptions within MLRA 116. The document will provide guidance to “approved”
parent materials and their occurrence on “specific” landforms. This document
could serve as a reference for update activities within MLRA 116.
2) A Soil Sampling Project Proposal Outline developed by
involved the NSSC to answer questions arising from this field trip. This
document will provide guidance for a comprehensive long range plan for soil
sampling in the future.
Objectives of the long range plan will be to resolve
unanswered questions as to parent materials, etc.; validate glossary concepts;
and help define the parent materials of “benchmark” soils.
Soil Scientists Explore Electromagnetics to Assist with Soil Delineation
By Diana Rose Angelo, Cartographic Technician
Larry Kichler, Soil Data Quality Specialist, MO-16
On March 7-9, NRCS soil scientists, conservationists,
archeologists, and technicians gathered to learn how to use an Electromagnetic
Conductivity meter (EM-38) and process the data.
Wes Tuttle, NRCS Geophysical Soil Scientist, arrived from
North Carolina with a trailer load of equipment in tow. Wes led the group of
Missouri and Arkansas individuals who had braved torrential downpours, high
winds, and threatening tornados to get a chance to learn how to use the
equipment.
The EM-38 is passed over the ground in a grid pattern as
the operator walks back and forth. It releases an electronic signal that
penetrates to a depth of about 1.5 meters. The signal passes through the ground
on the forward end of the instrument and is recorded by a receiver on the other
end. Changes to the signal due to differences in soil conductivity are recorded
every second and GPS coordinates are assigned to each reading and logged into a
handheld Allegro CX field PC recorder.
The EM is so sensitive to magnetic changes that the
operator must be metal free. That means no dangling keys and no metal shoe
insole supports or metal eyelets. The meter can even be rigged to rest on a
metal free cart pulled by a 4 wheeler for faster surveys. Wes carried just such
a cart in his equipment trailer and even a gator to pull it.
The processed data points can be downloaded and converted
into Arc GIS shapefile format delineating areas based on conductivity patterns.
NRCS Archeologist, John Riggs, also tried his hand with collecting and
processing the data to find magnetic anomalies that might indicate archeological
features.
The technology has the potential to reveal cultural sites
without invasive methods thus producing a large cost saving while not destroying
nonrenewable archeological resources. The processed data can reveal areas that
need further traditional testing for greater accuracy of soil description.
Large field areas can be surveyed in a shorter time period.
Other potential uses soil scientists are looking into include water table depth
variables, clay to sand contact points, saline concentrations, and locating
restrictive layers. The use of the Electromagnetic conductivity meter empowers
us to make better determinations on site specific areas, aiding conservationist
in land use decisions.
MO-16 Upcoming Soil Survey Activities
-
Southwest Missouri District FFA Soil Judging Contest,
Springfield, MO April 9-11
-
National Soil Interpretation Advisory Group, Lincoln,
NE, April 11-13
-
State Land Contest, Fayetteville, AR, April 14-15
-
NASIS Training, Greenville, MS, April 24-26
-
Tyler County TX Correlation, April 24-26
-
Caddo Parish LA Field Review, May 10-12
-
Field Assistance, Mayfield, KY June 5-9
-
South Region Soil Survey Work Planning Conference,
Oklahoma City, June 12-15
-
North Central Region Soil Survey Work Planning
Conference, Medora, ND, June 25-29
-
18th World Congress of Soil Science, Philadelphia, PA,
July 9-15
-
MO-16 Staff Meeting, Little Rock, AR, August
-
Glenwood AR Progress Review, August
-
Central State Soil Scientist Meeting, August 2-4
-
Missouri Soil Survey Work Planning meeting, Columbia,
MO, August 9
-
MO Leader’s Meeting, August 28-Sept 1
-
San Augustine-Sabine TX, mid-September
-
Field Review, Paris, TN, September 18-21
-
Central States Forest/Soils Workshop, Poplar Bluff,
Missouri, October 10-12
2006 Southern Cooperative Soil Survey Conference Planned for Oklahoma City,
Oklahoma, in June 2006
The theme of the Conference will be “Reconnecting and
Enhancing the National Cooperative Soil Survey Partnership”.
The 2006 Southern Regional Cooperative Soil Survey (NCSS)
Conference is planned for June 12-15, 2006, in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, at the
Clarion Meridian Hotel and Convention Center.
The Department of Plant and Soil Science, Oklahoma State
University is the co-host of the conference. A block of rooms has been reserved
under the heading of Southern Cooperative Soil Survey Conference. The conference
rate is $66.00 single/double per night. You must make your own room reservations
with the Clarion by MAY 19, 2006. Their phone number is (405) 942-8511.
Registration Fee is $125.00.
Included in Registration Fee are the Monday
social/refreshments, Wednesday banquet, and Thursday bus fees/food for tour.
Registration tables will be set up from 3:00 to 5:00 p.m. for those arriving on
Sunday, June 11, 2006. Late registration will be from 8:00 to 12:00 on Monday,
June 12, 2006.
The field tour will be on Thursday June 15, 2006. The tour
will involve looking at ecological sites, discussions on ecological site
factors, and developing quality Ecological Site Descriptions. Part of the tour
will be at Historic Fort Reno at El Reno, Oklahoma, which is now a Grazing Lands
ARS research station. The Steering Committee will meet after the conference on
Friday, June 16.
< Back to Soils
|